Decision comes on the
eve of poll schedule announcement
Habitations,
plantations and agricultural areas in the 123 villages falling within the
Western Ghat eco-sensitive area will be taken off the protective zone as
demanded by the Kerala government.
The Union Ministry of
Environment and Forests announced the decision on Tuesday, a day before the Election
Commission is likely to announce the Lok Sabha poll schedule, with which the
model code of conduct will come into force.
Yielding to political
pressure building up in the State for months, the Ministry said: “The State
government is of the view that agricultural lands, plantations and habitations
may be kept out of the Ecologically Sensitive Areas (ESAs). Recommendations of
the State government were examined, and it has been decided to accept them…”
To do justice to the
five other States in the Western Ghats region, the Ministry opened the space
for them to approach the Centre. “It has also been decided that the MoEF will
consider recommendations of the other States in the Western Ghats region, based
on a similar on-ground exercise, if such proposals are forwarded to the MoEF
within 60 days of issuance of the draft notification.”
In November 2013, the
Ministry passed two orders for implementing the Kasturirangan Committee’s
report. One of the orders, accepting the report in principle, said a formal ‘draft
notification’ demarcating the geographical boundaries of the ESA under the
Environment Protection Act, 1986, would shortly be put out for comments. Under
the law, the draft notification would have been open for comments for two
months before it was notified after amendments that the Centre may accept based
on inputs.
In a parallel second
order, the Ministry banned, with immediate effect, any environmental clearance
panel, either at the Centre or in the six States, from entertaining proposals
for new polluting industries, mining, thermal power plants or large
construction projects in the villages. The second order had not been withdrawn
till Tuesday evening when the press release claiming a revised boundary for the
ESA was sent out by the Ministry.
The Ministry’s November
2013 orders had specifically mentioned that agricultural, rural livelihood and
plantation practices would not be banned. But that offer did not assuage the
sentiments of powerful sections in Kerala which also found political support to
mount pressure on the UPA government to step back.
While the new Minister,
M. Veerappa Moily, did make a noise initially in favour of easing the orders,
the Ministry was in a bind in an ongoing case before the National Green
Tribunal. The Tribunal had warned that any complete withdrawal of the orders
could lead to implementation of the Madhav Gadgil Committee’s report, which
recommended far wider areas in the six States and stricter regulations than
what the Kasturirangan Committee did.
At the last hearing,
the Tribunal gave the ministry a month to take a clear stance. Unlike the
Madhav Gadgil Committee’s report, the Kasturirangan Committee demarcated
‘cultural landscapes’ from ‘natural landscapes,’ reducing the proposed
protected area to 60,000 square kilometres. The Kasturirangan Committee kept
out these cultural landscapes (area with a high population density), stating
“close to 60 per cent of the Western Ghats region is under cultural landscape —
human-dominated land use of settlements, agriculture and plantations.” But this
still did not find acceptance with lobbies in Kerala.
While issuing the press
release on Tuesday, the Ministry did not put out the draft notification for the
ESA, stating it would be done subsequently. Specific changes that it may have
made in the nature of restrictions as well as the specific areas proposed for
the protective zone remained unknown.
The release only said:
“The Ministry is now in the process of issuance of a draft notification which,
among other things, will include the demarcation and boundaries of Ecologically
Sensitive Areas, as identified by the High-Level Working Group [the
Kasturirangan Committee], seeking comments of various stakeholders.”
No comments:
Post a Comment